OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY

Business Policy and Strategic Management

MGT 750 - Fall 2004 - Syllabus

 

LOCATION:                        Peninsula Center/ Northern VA Center/ VA Beach/  ODU – Gornto 221

 

DATES/TIMES:                   August -  28th

                                                September - (4th no class – Labor Day), (11th no class-project), 18th, 25th (from NOVA)

                                                October - 2, (9th – no class – Fall Holiday), 16, 23rd, 30th

                                                November - 6th, 13th, 20th, (27th no class-Thanksgiving)

                                                December - 4th, 11th (final)

Saturdays -  11:15 PM to 2:15 PM

 

 

INSTRUCTOR:                   George M. Yacus, Ph.D.                                      Home:     1219 Davis Avenue

Office:  USCG Atlantic Area HQ                                        Chesapeake, VA 23325

Office Phone:  (757) 398-6417                             Home:     (757) 420-1056 (phone & FAX)

Office FAX:  (757) 391-8132                                Home E-mail:         georgeyacus@att.net

E-mail: gyacus@odu.edu (preferred)

Office Hours:  By appointment

 

 

TEXTBOOKS:                     Collis, David J. and Cynthia A. Montgomery, (2003). Corporate Strategy: Resources and the Scope of the Firm (Selected Chapters and Cases), (New York:McGraw Hill)

 

 

PREREQUISITES:              Graduate standing, nearing completion of the MBA program.

 

COURSE

DESCRIPTION:                  This course analyzes strategy formulation and implementation.  It covers how senior management makes strategic decisions, formulates corporate missions and objectives, analyzes business environments, develops strategic options, cultivates resources, creates distinctive competencies, and implements strategies to succeed in the international marketplace.

 

COURSE

CONTEXT:                           Most industrial activity in developed countries is carried out by large corporations which compete in more than one market. For example, in the U.S. in 1992, the 500 largest public companies sold $3.7 trillion worth of goods and services, or approximately 75% of the output of all U.S. public companies. On average these firms engaged in over 10 different lines of business, and had nearly 10% of their sales outside the U.S. The nature of these large corporations has undergone enormous change in the last thirty years, affecting both their scope and their structure. The merger and acquisition booms of the sixties and eighties extended the scope of existing multi-business corporations. More recently, capital market pressures forced every corporation to reassess its portfolio of businesses, level of overhead, and the way it coordinates and controls its multi-business activities. New forms of corporate organization, such as the LBO partnerships of the eighties, provoked a debate about the efficacy of corporate hierarchies. In addition, new institutional arrangements, such as joint ventures, alliances and franchising have come to prominence. Not surprisingly, only a few corporations have made it through the last thirty years intact.  Of the Fortune 500 in 1950, only 262 firms were still on the list in 1980. Small single-business companies likewise face many of the same problems and issues faced by their larger competitors.  Entrepreneurial start-up companies must decide the boundaries of the business activities they will undertake.

The intent of this course is to introduce students to the issues and the analytical arguments behind these concerns. In studying a range of firms, from start-up companies to global market leaders, the course builds on the tools introduced in nearly all the previous courses.

COURSE

OBJECTIVES:                     As a capstone course in our MBA program, students are required to have foundations in various functional areas:  accounting, economics, management, marketing, finance, decision sciences, and so forth. 

 

GRADING POINTS:          Total percentage possible = 100                                                       Grading System:

Participation & attendance                                 05 points                95-100%.............A

Team Topic Presentation                                    10 points                90-95%...............A-

Case Presentation (team)                                    20 points                88-90%...............B+

Final Case Analysis                                             30 points                83-88%...............B

Final Exam                                                             35 points                80-83%...............B-

(Scales are guidelines...instructor not bound by these numbers)               

 

GRADING:                           Grading is a function performed by the instructor to appraise how well the student comprehends and applies the course material.  It is performed by the instructor, is not a negotiation, is independent of the student’s perspective, and is a result of student performance with respect to assignments and examination and in relation to other students.  Grades are earned, not given.  Students that make a serious attempt to perform well and put forth sincere effort have a good chance of doing well in the course.   Students should confer early in the semester with the instructor if there are indications that the student is having trouble in the course.  The instructor and the university want the student to succeed, learn the course material, and ultimately graduate with a good command of theory and application.

 

CASE PRESENTATION

(TEAM):                                Teams are expected to make a detailed, comprehensive presentation of their assigned textbook cases.  One overall grade will be awarded per presentation.  Powerpoint slides should be sent to the instructor for presentation to the class, and students that are attending in the ODU Library can present directly from the podium.  You may switch or reorganize teams with the instructor’s approval.

 

TEAM TOPIC:                     Each team will present an assessment topic for the class designated by the instructor. 

 

FINAL CASE

ANALYSIS:                          Students will create a case study  concerning a particular company of interest.  It will include a thorough business analysis concerning  the company's ability to create a sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace. It can be current, meaning that the future has not yet determined whether the company picked the correct strategy, or it can be retrospective, showing what occurred and why it occurred.  It will be turned in to the instructor on Saturday, November 20th.  While I do not necessarily expect to talk with all students, you are welcome to review your choice of subject with me during the semester if you are uncertain of a topic's suitability.  The format of the paper should be text, exhibits and a bibliography of sources used. Multiple sources should be used and some degree of research is required.  While student initiative is always encouraged, it is not expected that you undertake field research for the paper, and calls to companies (other than to public relations department for basic information) are discouraged. The case should be no more than 10 double spaced pages of text and 10 exhibits (exclusive of bibliography). Length is not a virtue and students should “spend the time to make the document shorter.”

As you write your paper, you may choose to expand on some particular topical aspect that is relevant to the case.  For example:

1. Identify and evaluate the corporate strategy of a successful multi-business firm. Suggest changes (if any) that need to be/could have been made.

2. Explain the choice of organizational form that a corporation has adopted in part of its business, e.g., franchise, long-term contract, vertical integration. What are/were the merits/faults of this choice? Would an alternative form be/have been preferable? Attention should be paid both to the economic and managerial issues surrounding the choice of organizational form.

3. Identify a situation where competitors meet each other in multiple markets. or where there are strong scope economics across businesses. Describe the nature and extent of competitive interaction and evaluate its consequences.

It is expected that the conceptual frameworks detailed in the course will provide useful structure to the analysis. The paper should not only evaluate what the company in question has done, but should also discuss alternative courses of action that could have or should have been considered. Finally, the bulk of the paper should be your analysis of the situation, not a passive recounting of the company’s history. Your paper should be long on analysis and short on description.

 

FINAL EXAMINATION: 

Students will be tested on concepts covered in the main parts of the text.

Particular attention should be placed on the highlighted terms in the text, and students

                                                should know what these terms mean and why they are important in the discussion of business policy and strategy.

 

CLASS ATTENDANCE

AND PARTICIPATION:

Class participation will play an important role in the overall success of the student.  Student participation is expected. Participation is defined as regular attendance as well as contributing to class discussions and the learning experience of fellow students. Students are required to come to class fully prepared to discuss the readings and to have completed assignments on time. When students frequently miss class, the overall quality of the class is degraded and the student missing class suffers as well.  Class attendance is a graded criterion. You get one free absence, and lose one point after that for each class missed, up to max of 5 points.

 

 


Course Outline – MGMT 750: Business Policy and Strategy, Fall 2004

DATE

TOPIC/SSIGNMENT

PRESENTERS

CASE

TEAM

Saturday, August 28th

Introduction to Corporate Strategy

Chapter 1

 

 

Practice case of a company beginning with first letter of your last name

 

Saturday, September 4th

LABOR DAY

 

 

NO CLASS TODAY

Saturday, September 11th

PREP & READING  DAY

 

 

NO CLASS TODAY

Saturday, September 18th

 

Chapter 2

Resources & Rents

ODU Team 1

(1-1)

(1-2)

(1-1) ODU Team 1

(1-2) ODU Team 2

Practice Cases

ODU Team 2

 

Saturday September 25th

Chapter 3

Scale & Scope Within an Industry

NORVA Team 1

(3-1)

(3-1) NORVA Team 1

Practice Cases

 

 

Saturday, October 2nd

Chapter 4

Diversified Expansion

ODU Team 3

(4-2)

(4-2) ODU Team 3

Practice Cases

Saturday, October 9th

FALL HOLIDAY

 

 

NO CLASS TODAY

 

Saturday, October 16th

Chapter 5

Organizational Limits to Firm Scope

PEN CTR

(6-1)

(6-2)

(6-1) PEN CTR

(6-2) VA Beach Team 1

VAB Team 1

Saturday, October 23rd

 

Chapter 6

Managing the Multibusiness Corporation

NORVA Team 3

(6-4)

 

(6-6)

(6-4) ODU Team 4

 

(6-6) VA Beach Team 2

VAB Team 2

Saturday, October 30th

Chapter 8

Cases

Case Analysis Due

NORVA Team 2

 

 

(8-1)

 

 

(8-1) NORVA Team 2

Saturdy, November 6th

 

Financial Assessment

Operational Assessment

ODU Team 1

ODU Team 2

Intel

Amazon

 

Saturday, November 13th

HR as a Competitive Advantage

The Global Marketplace

ODU Team 3

NORVA Team 3

Microsoft

3M

 

 

Saturday, November 20th

Management Control

Value & Process of Strategic Planning

NORVA Team 1

NORVA Team 2

Teradyne

Apple

 

Saturday, November 27th

THANKSGIVING

 

 

NO CLASS TODAY

 

Saturday, December 4th

Balanced Scorecard Analysis

Malcolm Baldrige Criteria

VAB Team 1

VAB Team 2

Wal Mart

Review

 

Saturday, December 11th

Total Quality Management

Final

PEN CTR